#5e2d92_SMALL_Nov-Dec 2024 DRA Journal Cover

From myth-busting photobiomodulation therapy to showcasing advanced aesthetic cases, this issue delivers practical insights for modern dental practice. Explore evidence-based techniques in implant and veneer rehabilitation, essential guidance on monkeypox protocols, and strategies for enhanced patient communication.

>> FlipBook Version (Available in English)

>> Mobile-Friendly Version (Available in Multiple Languages)

Click here to access Asia's first Open-Access, Multi-Language Dental Publication

Halifax Dentist, 81, Seeks Dismissal of Assault Charges Involving Former Child Patients

Halifax dentist Dr. Errol Gaum, 81, facing eight charges of assaulting six complainants in the 1970s and 1980s, is seeking to have the charges dropped. His lawyer, Stan MacDonald, asserts that the inability to mount a proper defense stems from the loss of crucial records and the unavailability of former assistants who could testify.

Challenges to a Fair Trial

MacDonald argued before Judge Elizabeth Buckle, urging her to stay the charges, emphasizing the significant loss of evidence over the years. Destroyed patient records and the inability to locate former employees pose challenges to Dr. Gaum’s ability to present a fair defense.

Read: Tokyo Dentist Arrested for Indecent Assault on Patient

Dr. Gaum, with a nearly 50-year career and around 90,000 patient visits, mostly for specialty treatment with sedation, testified that he doesn’t recall any of the complainants. He frequently administered a sedative called Mellaril, causing some children to hallucinate. Patient records outlining treatments and medications were destroyed after seven years, hindering the defense’s ability to assess sedation and its effects on the children.

Lost Witnesses and Uncertain Patient Identities

The court heard that Dr. Gaum cannot recall the names of dental hygienists and assistants from that period. Five of the six complainants reported the presence of a dental assistant during the alleged assaults, but Dr. Gaum can’t remember their names, impeding the defense from locating potential witnesses.

Read: Canadian Paediatric Dentist Suspended for Improper Conduct with Staff member

Crown prosecutor Laura Lindsay argued against a stay, emphasizing that a perfect trial is not entitlement but a fair one. Lindsay considered the loss of documents and the unavailability of witnesses as common challenges in legal proceedings, suggesting there are still avenues for Dr. Gaum’s defense.

Financial Motive and Class-Action Lawsuit

MacDonald brought up a potential financial motive, referencing complainants discussing suing Dr. Gaum on Facebook and the previous class-action lawsuit filed in 2020, which stalled after a judge’s refusal to certify it. A new lawsuit involving 29 plaintiffs has been filed, but none are connected to the criminal case.

Dr. Gaum’s dentistry license was suspended in November 2020. The Provincial Dental Board of Nova Scotia has not provided an update on his case.

The information and viewpoints presented in the above news piece or article do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policy of Dental Resource Asia or the DRA Journal. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of our content, Dental Resource Asia (DRA) or DRA Journal cannot guarantee the constant correctness, comprehensiveness, or timeliness of all the information contained within this website or journal.

Please be aware that all product details, product specifications, and data on this website or journal may be modified without prior notice in order to enhance reliability, functionality, design, or for other reasons.

The content contributed by our bloggers or authors represents their personal opinions and is not intended to defame or discredit any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual, or any entity or individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *