#5e2d92_SMALL_Nov-Dec 2024 DRA Journal Cover

From myth-busting photobiomodulation therapy to showcasing advanced aesthetic cases, this issue delivers practical insights for modern dental practice. Explore evidence-based techniques in implant and veneer rehabilitation, essential guidance on monkeypox protocols, and strategies for enhanced patient communication.

>> FlipBook Version (Available in English)

>> Mobile-Friendly Version (Available in Multiple Languages)

Click here to access Asia's first Open-Access, Multi-Language Dental Publication

Study Compares Colour Accuracy of SLR and Smartphone Cameras in Dental Photography

HONG KONG: Researchers from the Faculty of Dentistry at The University of Hong Kong have conducted a study comparing the colour accuracy of digital photographs taken using a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical setting. The findings of this research may have implications for dental photography and the tools used in the field.

The study, titled “Comparison of the colour accuracy of a single-lens reflex camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical context,” aimed to determine how accurately these two types of cameras capture colours in a clinical dental environment.

Read: GRIP&SHOOT dental photography app

Methodology And Key Findings

Dentate subjects were recruited for the study, and their maxillary anterior teeth were photographed alongside a colour target and a dental shade guide. The researchers organised eight groups for comparison:

  • SLR camera with a 100 mm macro-lens and a ring-flash (SLRC)
  • SLRC with a polariser
  • SLRC with white-balance calibration
  • SLRC with a polariser and white-balance calibration
  • Smartphone camera with an external light source (SC)
  • SC with a polariser
  • SC with white-balance calibration
  • SC with a polariser and white-balance calibration

The study measured the colour differences (ΔE) between the digital photographs and reference colour coordinates or dental spectrophotometer readings. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

The study involved 39 subjects, and the results indicated several noteworthy findings:

  • SLRC with a polariser showed the largest ΔE, suggesting reduced colour accuracy.
  • SLRC with calibrated white-balance resulted in the smallest ΔE, indicating better colour accuracy.
  • The use of a polariser and/or calibrated white-balance did not significantly improve colour accuracy compared to SC alone.
Read: Product: Shofu EyeSpecial C-IV

Implications and Recommendations

The researchers concluded that calibrating white-balance is advisable when using an SLRC for intraoral photography. Interestingly, the study found that the use of a polariser did not substantially enhance colour accuracy.

For dental practitioners, this study suggests that calibrating white-balance is crucial when capturing intraoral photography with an SLR camera. However, a smartphone camera with an external light source can serve as a viable alternative, as it may provide sufficient color accuracy.

This research from the University of Hong Kong sheds light on the nuances of dental photography and the equipment used, offering valuable insights for dental professionals seeking to achieve precise colour reproduction in their work.

Read: Intraoral camera inspired by insect eyes

The information and viewpoints presented in the above news piece or article do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policy of Dental Resource Asia or the DRA Journal. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of our content, Dental Resource Asia (DRA) or DRA Journal cannot guarantee the constant correctness, comprehensiveness, or timeliness of all the information contained within this website or journal.

Please be aware that all product details, product specifications, and data on this website or journal may be modified without prior notice in order to enhance reliability, functionality, design, or for other reasons.

The content contributed by our bloggers or authors represents their personal opinions and is not intended to defame or discredit any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual, or any entity or individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *