#5e2d92_SMALL_Nov-Dec 2024 DRA Journal Cover

From myth-busting photobiomodulation therapy to showcasing advanced aesthetic cases, this issue delivers practical insights for modern dental practice. Explore evidence-based techniques in implant and veneer rehabilitation, essential guidance on monkeypox protocols, and strategies for enhanced patient communication.

>> FlipBook Version (Available in English)

>> Mobile-Friendly Version (Available in Multiple Languages)

Click here to access Asia's first Open-Access, Multi-Language Dental Publication

AI in Healthcare: Public and NHS Staff Perspectives Revealed

Majority Support for AI in Patient Care and Administration

A recent survey conducted by the Health Foundation has unveiled significant support for the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings. The study, which surveyed 1,292 NHS staff and 7,200 members of the public, found that more than three-quarters of healthcare professionals are in favour of using AI for patient care, with an even higher percentage (81%) supporting its use in administrative tasks.

Tim Horton, assistant director of insight and analysis at the Health Foundation, commented on the findings: “Interest is growing rapidly in the potential of artificial intelligence to improve health care. While it is not a panacea, it could play a significant role in helping to ease NHS pressures and support the workforce.”

Read: AI is changing the face of orthodontics

Public Opinion: A More Cautious Approach

While the public’s stance on AI in healthcare is generally positive, it appears to be more reserved compared to that of healthcare professionals. The survey revealed that 54% of the public support AI use in patient care, with a slightly higher approval rate (61%) for its application in administrative tasks.

Interestingly, demographic factors seem to influence public perception. The 16-24 age group was found to be the least likely to believe that AI would improve patient care. Additionally, women were less inclined than men to see potential benefits in AI-assisted healthcare.

Concerns and Reservations

Despite the overall positive outlook, the survey highlighted several concerns among both the public and healthcare staff. Approximately 18% of the public believed that AI could potentially worsen patient care. The primary concerns revolved around AI accuracy and its impact on the interpersonal aspect of healthcare delivery.

One significant worry, expressed by one-third of public respondents, was that healthcare staff might not question AI outputs, potentially leading to errors. Among NHS staff, 65% expressed concerns that AI might create a sense of distance between them and their patients.

Read: AI-Powered ‘Robot Dentist’ Completes First Automated Procedure

Varied Perspectives Within Healthcare Professions

The survey revealed interesting variations in attitudes among different healthcare professions. While 57% of all staff expressed enthusiasm about incorporating AI into their roles, dental and medical professionals showed a more positive outlook compared to other groups.

Addressing Public Concerns and Building Confidence

Tim Horton emphasized the importance of addressing public concerns and building confidence in AI systems: “If AI is to be accepted, and the benefits fully realised, it will have to command the confidence of patients, the public and NHS staff.”

He further added, “The Health Foundation’s research suggests the public and NHS staff, on balance, support the use of AI for clinical and administrative purposes. But some remain unconvinced, and so it’s crucial to engage people in a conversation about the future of health care – in order to understand and address their concerns.”

The Path Forward

As AI continues to evolve and integrate into healthcare systems, ongoing dialogue and education will be crucial. Previous surveys have shown that increased knowledge about AI tends to improve public perception. Moving forward, it will be essential to address concerns, showcase the potential benefits, and ensure that the implementation of AI in healthcare is done thoughtfully and transparently.

The information and viewpoints presented in the above news piece or article do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policy of Dental Resource Asia or the DRA Journal. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of our content, Dental Resource Asia (DRA) or DRA Journal cannot guarantee the constant correctness, comprehensiveness, or timeliness of all the information contained within this website or journal.

Please be aware that all product details, product specifications, and data on this website or journal may be modified without prior notice in order to enhance reliability, functionality, design, or for other reasons.

The content contributed by our bloggers or authors represents their personal opinions and is not intended to defame or discredit any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual, or any entity or individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *