Australia’s Dental Care Divide: Public vs. Private Spending

Key Takeaways

• Over 50% of federal dental spending funds private insurance rebates, leaving many without coverage to delay care.
• Untreated dental decay and hospital admissions for preventable procedures are rising.
• A two-tiered system exacerbates inequality, with low-income groups disproportionately affected.
• Calls for universal dental care under Medicare grow, but cost and implementation remain challenges.
• Current programs like the Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) see low uptake, particularly among vulnerable groups.

---

Federal Spending Skews Toward Private Insurance

Australia’s federal government spent $1.36 billion on dental services in 2022-23, with $825 million—over 60%—allocated to private health insurance rebates. These rebates, designed to ease the financial burden of premiums, disproportionately benefit those who can afford private coverage. Meanwhile, individuals shoulder 61% of the nation’s $12 billion annual dental costs, according to Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) data.

Peter Breadon, health program director at the Grattan Institute, highlights the systemic imbalance: “The share the patient pays for dental care is nine times higher than GP visits and five times higher than for medicines.” This disparity, he argues, drives over 2 million Australians to delay or skip care, worsening oral health outcomes.

---

Hospitalizations Rise as Prevention Fails

Neglecting dental issues often leads to severe complications. In 2023, over 80,000 people sought hospital care for dental procedures—including tooth extractions—many of which could have been prevented with timely access to care. Breadon notes this trend reflects a “false economy,” as delayed treatment fuels long-term costs: “Skimping on dental care… leads to expensive hospital treatments that could have been avoided.”

Public dental services, meant to support low-income groups, cover just 20% of eligible patients’ needs. Dr. Ankur Singh of the University of Sydney criticizes the rebate system: “People experiencing social disadvantage are punished twice”—first by limited public access, then by rebates favoring those with private insurance.

---

Calls for Universal Care Grow Louder

A 2023 Senate inquiry urged the government to integrate dental care into Medicare, labeling the current system “two-tiered.” The report found half of Australians lack adequate access to services, with rural, Indigenous, and disabled communities disproportionately affected. Breadon supports universal coverage but emphasizes cost containment: excluding cosmetic treatments and targeting underserved areas could reduce expenses from $20 billion to $7 billion annually.

Existing federal programs, like the CDBS, face challenges. While 2.4 million children were eligible in 2023-24, only 39.2% utilized the scheme. Uptake remains lowest among rural, First Nations, and disabled children, prompting efforts to boost awareness.

---

Government Response and Future Plans

A Department of Health and Aged Care spokesperson cited ongoing work to develop a national oral health plan (2025-34) aimed at reducing inequalities. Current initiatives include state-funded public dental services, the National Health Reform Agreement, and support for the Royal Flying Doctor Service. However, advocates argue these measures fall short of addressing systemic gaps.

Breadon sums up the urgency: “It’s a big problem, and it’s growing… as our population gets older.” Without structural reform, Australia’s dental divide risks deepening, leaving millions in pain and straining hospitals with preventable crises.

This article is based on reporting from The Guardian