CANADA: Sentencing proceedings for Dr. Louis Bourget, the oral surgeon who pleaded guilty to assault for permitting a prison guard to conduct dental work on a sedated inmate, have encountered an unexpected delay.
The case, unfolding in Gander Supreme Court, witnessed submissions temporarily halted as defence attorney Randy Piercey contested the victim impact statement presented by the inmate, Blair Harris.
“In 40 years, I’ve never objected to a victim impact [statement]. I have to object to this,” asserted Piercey without elaborating on the specific grounds for his challenge.
Unusual Challenge to Victim Impact Statement
Victim impact statements, typically undisputed, provide a platform for crime victims to express the physical, emotional, or economic repercussions of an incident. In an unusual turn of events, Piercey’s objection to Harris’s statement has introduced a rare courtroom challenge. The written submission is yet to be disclosed in court, prompting Crown attorney Tina Walsh to engage with Harris in an attempt to resolve the matter.
As per the agreed statement of facts, revealed prior to the victim impact statement submission, unsettling details of the assault came to light. The incident occurred in October 2020 when correctional officers Ron McDonald and Roy Goodyear, accompanying inmate Blair Harris to Gander Family Dental Clinic, took an unexpected interest in the dental procedure conducted by Bourget.
“I got caught up in a teaching moment,” admitted Bourget, who regretted the decision after the extraction of four teeth, with McDonald performing the procedure while Goodyear recorded it.
The departure from standard procedure, where officers leave the room post-sedation, raised concerns. The dental assistant and nurse on staff expressed shock at Bourget’s decision, as disclosed in the court statement.
Future Court Proceedings
With Dr. Louis Bourget’s matter now scheduled to return to court on March 5, the sentencing submissions for Ron McDonald, who also pleaded guilty to assault, have been deferred until June. Meanwhile, charges against Roy Goodyear have been dropped.
The unfolding legal proceedings bring to light a case that not only involves a disturbing breach of protocol but also a rare challenge to a victim impact statement in the Canadian legal landscape.
The information and viewpoints presented in the above news piece or article do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policy of Dental Resource Asia or the DRA Journal. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of our content, Dental Resource Asia (DRA) or DRA Journal cannot guarantee the constant correctness, comprehensiveness, or timeliness of all the information contained within this website or journal.
Please be aware that all product details, product specifications, and data on this website or journal may be modified without prior notice in order to enhance reliability, functionality, design, or for other reasons.
The content contributed by our bloggers or authors represents their personal opinions and is not intended to defame or discredit any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual, or any entity or individual.