Potential Benefits of Sugar Tax for Dental Care, Reveals Study

Australia: New research suggests that implementing a 20% national sugar tax in Australia could yield substantial benefits for both public health and the nation’s finances. The study, conducted over six years by Tan Nguyen, a PhD candidate at Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, in collaboration with Deakin University and the University of Melbourne, projects significant cost savings and a decrease in dental cavities.

Nguyen explained that the modelling work for the sugar tax intervention is based on a range of parameters relevant to the Australian context. The study’s results indicate that over a ten-year period, such a sugar tax could potentially save more than $60 million for the nation, while preventing over 500,000 dental cavities.

Oral health of older Australians at risk due to lack of government action on dental care

Savings and Health Benefits

Under a lifetime scenario considering the current Australian population until death, the 20% sugar tax is predicted to result in societal cost savings of $176.6 million and direct healthcare savings of $122.5 million. Moreover, it is estimated that there would be 1,309,211 fewer decayed teeth and 254.9 years of disability averted.

Highlighting the importance of the research, Mr. Nguyen emphasized that understanding the impact of excessive sugar on society is crucial. The findings are part of a broader effort to identify cost-effective interventions for the government to invest in to improve public health.

Global Context: Sugar Taxes in Other Countries

Over 50 countries worldwide have already implemented sugar taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages, with studies indicating that such taxes lead to reduced consumption, especially among lower-income households. Nguyen stressed that a sugar tax promotes health equity and governments should be open to the idea. He suggested that the generated revenue from the tax could be directed towards funding public dental care, which is currently not universally covered.

Australian dental health research underfunded

Drawing parallels, the UK’s Soft Drinks Industry Levy, introduced in 2019, resulted in soft drink producers reformulating their products to meet standards and avoid taxation. This led to a reduction in high-sugar drinks on supermarket shelves, without adversely affecting sales.

The Impact of Excessive Sugar Consumption

Australians are found to consume an average of about half a kilogram of sugar per week, significantly exceeding the World Health Organization’s recommended maximum daily intake of 60g. High sugar diets have been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, raised blood pressure, and chronic inflammation. While sugar itself does not directly cause type 2 diabetes, its negative effects on the liver have been associated with an elevated risk.

The majority of added sugars in the diet, excluding those from natural sources, are derived from soft drinks, energy or sports drinks, grain-based desserts, fruit drinks, dairy desserts, and confectioneries.

Potential Implications for Dental Health and Beyond

As the proposal for a sugar tax gains attention, its potential to improve dental health and overall well-being in Australia becomes a point of interest. With mounting evidence from the study, policymakers and health experts may explore the viability of such an intervention to protect both oral health and public finances in the long run. 

The prospect of using tax revenue to promote essential dental services adds weight to the argument, underscoring the potential positive impact on the nation’s dental care landscape.