This issue covers a diverse range of topics, including: The mental health crisis in dentistry; molar distalization for Class II malocclusion; slow maxillary expansion for cleft lip and palate patients; planning successful smile makeovers; navigating Malaysia's evolving oral healthcare landscape; and the convergence of emerging technologies revolutionizing dental practice.

>> FlipBook Version (Available in English)

>> Mobile-Friendly Version (Available in Multiple Languages)

Click here to access Asia's first Open-Access, Multi-Language Dental Publication

US$1 Million Awarded in Dental Malpractice Case

USA: A Winchester Circuit Court jury has awarded Christine Frey, a Winchester woman, $1 million in compensatory damages after her dentist, Dr. Eric D. Starley of Winchester Oral Surgery Center, extracted nine upper teeth during a procedure in January 2023, despite her consent only being for the removal of lower teeth, according to an article published in the Winchester Star (https://www.winchesterstar.com/) by C. Max Bachmann.

As reported by the Winchester Star, Frey recounted the incident, saying, “I said, ‘Ha ha very funny,’ or as much as I could say through the gauze, and then his face just kind of fell, and he was like, ‘What do you mean, I thought that’s what you wanted me to do.'”

The three-day trial culminated in the jury’s decision to award Frey $1 million in compensatory damages, although they decided against further punitive action. Frey’s lawsuit had initially sought $2.5 million in compensatory damages for malpractice and $500,000 in punitive damages. 


Click to Visit website of India's Leading Manufacturer of World Class Dental Materials, Exported to 90+ Countries.


 

Read: Compensation Awarded in Landmark Dental Malpractice Case

According to the Winchester Star, Dr. Starley’s attorney, Tracie M. Dorfman, stated, “Dr. Starley did not do this on purpose. He thought she said all of her teeth and he admits that he misheard her.” Dorfman added that Starley was willing to pay for the estimated $130,000 cost of further dental work, but Frey had cut off communication.

Frey expressed satisfaction with the jury’s decision, stating, “I believe that the amount is certainly sufficient to accomplish what I wanted to accomplish from the start, which was to send a message and to hopefully not allow this to happen to somebody else.” However, she emphasized that no amount of money could compensate for the trauma she endured.

The Winchester Star’s article serves as the source for this news report, providing a comprehensive account of the dental malpractice case and its resolution.

Read: Insufficient Pre-Check-ups Before Tooth Extraction Result in Dental Malpractice

The information and viewpoints presented in the above news piece or article do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policy of Dental Resource Asia or the DRA Journal. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of our content, Dental Resource Asia (DRA) or DRA Journal cannot guarantee the constant correctness, comprehensiveness, or timeliness of all the information contained within this website or journal.

Please be aware that all product details, product specifications, and data on this website or journal may be modified without prior notice in order to enhance reliability, functionality, design, or for other reasons.

The content contributed by our bloggers or authors represents their personal opinions and is not intended to defame or discredit any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual, or any entity or individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *