This issue covers a diverse range of topics, including: The mental health crisis in dentistry; molar distalization for Class II malocclusion; slow maxillary expansion for cleft lip and palate patients; planning successful smile makeovers; navigating Malaysia's evolving oral healthcare landscape; and the convergence of emerging technologies revolutionizing dental practice.

>> FlipBook Version (Available in English)

>> Mobile-Friendly Version (Available in Multiple Languages)

Click here to access Asia's first Open-Access, Multi-Language Dental Publication

18-Yo Awarded £10K For Dentist’s Alleged Failure to Detect Decay

UK: According to an article published on May 25, 2024 in the Daily Mail, an 18-year-old from Stockport named Toby Parker was recently awarded £10,000 after undergoing a “really painful” tooth extraction. Parker claims the extraction could have been avoided if his dentist had identified signs of decay during his earlier childhood visits over the span of a decade.

The article states that Parker’s tooth decay was only diagnosed in 2021 after he visited a dental hospital for a second opinion regarding potential orthodontic treatment. Despite his dentist applying fluoride toothpaste, Parker alleges “no decay was ever identified or treated.”

Read: HR Adviser Wins £40,000 Payout Over Botched Dental Treatment

Consequences and Settlement

Due to the extent of decay found, Parker required one tooth to be extracted as well as fillings for three other affected teeth. As a result of the extraction, he claims to now be “unable to eat ice cream” and is “missing a tooth which I should’ve had for the rest of my life.”


Click to Visit website of India's Leading Manufacturer of World Class Dental Materials, Exported to 90+ Countries.


 

In 2021, Parker and his parents contacted the Dental Law Partnership, who determined that years of undiagnosed decay had been left untreated despite signs that should have been spotted and addressed by 2018, leading to significant deterioration.

The case was settled out of court in February 2024, with Parker receiving £10,000, although the dentist did not admit liability. Poppy Heslop of the Dental Law Partnership stated:

“The distress and pain our client has experienced was completely unnecessary. If the dentist involved had provided more satisfactory treatment, his problems could have been avoided.”

Read: Settlement Reached After Botched Dental Work

Patient’s Perspective

Parker expressed disappointment at the situation, saying:

“It’s annoying and now my teeth are so sensitive I can’t eat cold things like ice cream. But more importantly, it’s the shock of the whole thing and disappointment at the mistakes the dentist made at a crucial point of time in my life, especially after the amount of trust I put into him as a child.”

He also expressed concerns about future dental visits:

“It’s really not pleasant when you find out the person you trusted for years has let you down, and I’m now scared of going back to the dentist.”

The information and viewpoints presented in the above news piece or article do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policy of Dental Resource Asia or the DRA Journal. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of our content, Dental Resource Asia (DRA) or DRA Journal cannot guarantee the constant correctness, comprehensiveness, or timeliness of all the information contained within this website or journal.

Please be aware that all product details, product specifications, and data on this website or journal may be modified without prior notice in order to enhance reliability, functionality, design, or for other reasons.

The content contributed by our bloggers or authors represents their personal opinions and is not intended to defame or discredit any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual, or any entity or individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *